I don't see it. My inlines include two Knights, Accura V2, Optima, Vortek UL, and the Omega.

It took me a little while to realize it, but the Wolf is every bit as good, and better than some of those guns.

What makes a gun good to me is how everything functions. How smooth is the action? How tight do the parts fit? How is the trigger?

The most important part is, how accurate is it?

The next thing is what was wrong with it? Did I need warranty work? Were the problems fixable, or do I have to live with the problem the gun has?

Maybe I got lucky, and got a better than average Wolf, but to me. The Wolf beats out the other guns.

I'm not even a fan of inline muzzleloaders. However, they are more practical than a sidelock for me at my age. I need a gun that's light, doesn't recoil, is accurate, and dependable.

I don't judge a gun by it's price tag. Some guns are a rip off, and some guns are a bargain. The Wolf is a huge bargain.

If a gun with a laminated stock and SS barrel make it a high quality gun? I'll pass. I think they're butt ugly. Performance is what should be important. Not a bunch of fluff that some guys are afraid to scratch. LOL

In my case. The Wolf is an entry level gun (your words), that i'll never have to advance from. You can do much better than a Bergara barrel. The Wolf has one, and it doesn't need to be SS, fluted, or even longer. It shoots just as good the way it is.

btw..The Omega was the worse gun in the bunch.