Geez meathead/hunter. Im not sure ive ever seen one poster make so many mistruths in one single post in my life. Only a couple of people i know of would do that. Is that you Mr Rosenberry?, Mr. Dubrock?
-His claim about working for the game commission is false. They have no records of his employment and both current and retired personel have said they never heard of the guy.
Sorry slanderer, but he never said he did work FOR the game commission. Can you provide a link to anywhere that he had stated this? No? I didnt think so. Dont let accuracy get in the way of your smear campaign.
"-His claim about working for Penn State as a research scientist and ordering several studies done is false, according to PSU's history of their wildlife research unit. His only link was as a student."
Youre wrong. And its well documented. It has been looked into and confirmed. Nothing but a smear campaign by a disgruntled antideer damage control agent.
-His claim about a newspaper article done on him as "the bear man" seems to be photo-shopped, as the newspaper company has no record of it.
You are funnier by the minute. Just because YOU didnt personally read a decades old article doesnt mean it didnt exist. He has a copy of it and again, its documented if you have the resources to confirm. Although that not convenient for you or your agenda apparently.
-His claim of Dr. Alt worshiping him and he being the reason Alt choose to study bears has been defunked by the Dr. himself, who claims to not even remember the guy, plus the time frame is way off.
Sorry pal. Time frame WASNT off, and he made a very general comment that Alt probably now regrets making because its come back to bite him in the keister. Also, "worship" is nothing more than your gross exaggeration.
Again, falsehood. -
His claim that he discovered how to age animal teeth by counting the rings is false, since records show biologists across the country had been using that techniques when Eveland would have still been in highschool.
You taking statements out of context intentionallly just like you do on the other boards.
-His claims of developing the game commissions Elk management plan is false and the only reference to Eveland in it is a study done during his time there as a student collecting data for PSU.
His statement, again, right on the mark. You are simply trying to downplay his participation. He never said he was acting leader of the research group, or gave all that many details for you to jump to your conclusions. He just inferred he took part in some ground breaking research, was instrumental, and he was.
And another mistruth:
-And it was pretty well known a few years back that him and a politician were caught trying to broker a backroom deal to use taxpayer money to have him do an audit, out of the light of day. He was later denied because of his bias. The sportsmen wanted a fair, out of state, unbiased company to do it.
Actually im quite aware of what occurred. Some "prohunting" legislators wanted him because he was an unbiased source. But instead the man holding the funding via his position on the legislative budget and finance committe- a pgc & environmentalist/audubon/pennfuture/etc. ally, Mr. Dave Levdansky took things upon himself to instead hire an outfit that was run by the previous deputy executive director and also the ex-pgc exec. director. Not only were the gentlemen previous highest ranking positions at pgc making them highly bias, they were previously fired due to payroll manipulation charges, which would speak to their credibility and character. They are also men with environmentalist connections. They didnt fit in at pgc very well previously, but im sure they would with the current crew today.
That travesty lead to the end of Mr. Levdanskies decades long political career. The voters showed him what we thought of the well documented antics.
That should leave a mark.
The truth usually does.