Im not sure whats so hard to understand here. A company can settle out of court for a relatively small amount of $$$, or take their chances with a jury of people, who would probably be home watching jerry springer, if they werent serving jury duty. What would it even prove if they did? Even if they win, the media will still attack the firearms industry, and 75% of the public out there, will buy into it.

I also dont get why, if you dont buy into the CNBC BS, youre some kinda remington defender, like I could care less if remington sells another rifle ever, I just dont buy into the internet and media hype about poor quality ,and dangerous triggers. Call me whatever, but I believe in seeing it, before believing it.

On a final note, is there some sort of page limit on dumb threads or something? Why would someone who thinks there should be, keep posting in one?