Originally Posted by
Jeff Ovington
You have no problem with Rem Settling.
With setteling comes responsiblity of actions taken or did.
How much resposibility? I don't know, but at least some. Sure the kid didn't deserve to die, and the mom did everything wrong that could have gone wrong. But with Rem settling this case they took responsibilty as well.Remington should never have done it, but they did.And your all for it..But at the same time want you want Remington to have no reponsibilty at all, for any of it, for a court case they settled on.Take my advice, take over the Rem Management hire qualified personal, fire the lawyers and
get these cases overturned.And I agree this terrible rumer hurts gun owners. So
when you get to head office, first on the agenda ..Is to make Remington stop Settling Court Cases.It works both sides you see..Some form of guilt comes with settling.
Cause your right it does hurt all gun owners. Put the blame squarly on the guilty party
whomever it may be..
Damn, you really dont understand how lawsuits work, do you? Im no lawyer myself, but even I realize that the way it works is, the ambulance chaser attorney, displays photos of a dead kid shot with a rem700, in front of a jury of people who know nothing about how firearms operate, and they award the plaintiff with waaaaaaaaaaay more $$$ than they would have gotten, if they settled out of court, get it? I has nothing to do with guilt. I explained that before, guess you missed it.