HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Yellowstone is Dead
View Single Post
Old 01-24-2011, 07:20 AM
  #105  
moremules
Spike
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 59
Talking

Originally Posted by dack77
Sorry I didn't put two and two together after reading some of the comments regarding staying up all night watching cattle, etc. Still a bias exists which you cannot deny but you will continue to try and do so because you have an agenda. Do you not care what the benefits are of the wolf reintroduction or do you only care that all wolves are dead? You come to this site to post Yellowstone is Dead thinking this is a great place to push your agenda and I have no doubt that you are upset that you aren't getting the "kill all wolves" sentiment from everyone on this site because there are intelligent people who see things for what they are.

But seriously, you really want to play this game? Do your own research by searching benefits of wolf reintroduction and you will get plenty of hits with plenty of scientific works. Just like you will get plenty of hits for the opposite argument. You could read everything from the Sierra Club, Westernwolves.org, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, and any other site but it all comes down to the same thing as YOU, they all have an agenda. You are seriously trying to tell me there is not a benefit to having wolves in the wild and that there cannot be any middle ground?

And I want to note, I am not an advocate for wolves, never have been, never will be but I do actually have a brain to think for myself instead of having someone like moremules push their agenda on me.
Dack, theres and old saying that goes, "you can Bull**** the Fans, but you can't Bull**** the Players". You and a few others on here thought I was a fan. The lower 48 had it's own native wolves, the USFWS and IDFG new this, they also knew that the native wolves would not produce the damage that was needed in order to fulfill agendas, ED Bangs and Defenders of wildlife brought the biggest baddest wolf they could find into the lower 48 and they did it illegally. If this wolf is what you are trying to say, why is it that the USFWS and environmentalists have lied to everyone from the very beginning?

I have DONE my own research, I have read the lies of the pro-wolf side and like you, I can nock their d$cks in the dirt in any wolf debate, if I get into any trouble I have a whole slew of people I can bring in that have been living in this wolf mess since the beginning and believe me they know from experience what these wolves have done. When the wolf cult starts loosing a debate the first thing they do is start name calling and hate shoots from their mouth, the most vile language you wouldn't let your dog listen to flies from their lips, they threaten to kill you and your children. They try to turn the wolf around just like you did, saying that those who don't want this wolf have agendas. The problem that the wolf cult is having today is their lies are being exposed, we have 15 years of proof on the ground in WY, Mt, and Idaho and now the the same lies are being used in states that are going through the "release and then discover" program. Write a wolf plan and the wolves will show up. When you said you could throw up more proof then I could, I realized what I was dealing with. I don't think Utah will allow wolves in their state they have seen the damage.

I put the trailers to Scott Rockholm's documentary on this hunting site to inform people and with the hope that they would inform others. I checked back into see how many had viewed my post. I find it very hard to listen to people who push a wolf they know nothing about and that my friend is where we are today.

Last edited by moremules; 01-24-2011 at 07:55 AM.
moremules is offline