Originally Posted by
moremules
Finnbear>Ya see mr mules....yer one of these people that have to blame everything on something and it's always someone or something Else's fault!!! You are so intent on trying to make me look stupid that you can't even see the points I'm trying to make!!!! you are so intent on trying to prove this big conspiracy that you fail to see the Forest for the trees....<
Finnbear I will have to disagree with you again, I am not the one making you look stupid, you are handling that job just fine all by your self. I know of the problems with poaching of elk by the Indians and whites both, but what you may not know yet is that wolves have been hitting the Colockum elk also. And when the wolves get going you won't be talking about the people poaching near as much.
Finnbear, have you looked at Idaho, Montana and Wyoming? Have you read about the problems they have encountered? Do you know about the Lolo elk herd? How about the moose that they once had?Do you honestly think the people of these states are making a big fuss about these wolves just because they don't like wolves? Do you know anything about the Mexican wolves that the feds dropped into the middle of cattle country and the problems the people of Arizona have had? Do you know what the spotted owl did to the timber industry?
http://www.takingliberty.us/TLHome.html Maybe if you did a little studying you wouldn't have to blame someone else for making you look Stupid.
For every website you post backing your claims, I could post 5 with a rebuttal but that doesn't make it truth. If you read and believe everything on the internet, you're just as dumb as everyone else. Read both sides, take in as much information as possible, and then when you think you've made up your mind about who is right and who is wrong, then read up some more. I promise you are not getting the full truth from anyone in any of those websites regardless if they are pro or anti wolf. This whole wolves are good and bad is almost worst than politics because of the huge polar differences and the lack of budging on either side to actually know there are pros and cons to both sides of the aisle and that the most beneficial outcome is probably more of something that lies in the middle.
We as humans tend to over think everything. We "know" what is best for the wildlife, the environment, and just about everything else because we can make decisions. When humans get involved, emotion and bias gets put into everything we touch because we can't separate how we feel from what the "true" science is telling us. True science is completely unaltered, unbiased evidence that very rarely ever exists now that politics and money are involved.