He doesn't HAVE to buy any bows. He GETS to buy 10 at prices lower than you....a dealer....pays. What's communism got to do with that?
I didn't say he HAD to buy bows. Communist attitude has to do with....
If I were a dealer......I wouldn't be happy about it (someone being able to buy and sell bows cheaper and for more profit than I).
You see... someone with a capitalist/free market way of thinking doens't worry about what the other guy negotiates for themselves. They worry about what they are doing and what they are negotiating for themselves. Those that always worry about the other guy are always behind the 8 ball. Communists do and would prefer to regulate it so that it can't happen.
Are you OK if I...a regular consumer....can buy bows from Bowtech, cheaper than you can? Why? Are you a communist?
Is MeanV a regular consumer or corporate staff and/or dealer? Nope, don't bother me a bit. Anyone with the desire and the qualifications that a manufacturer is looking for can apply to be a corporate staff shooter for one of the manufacturers and get the same perks if selected. As a dealer the more you buy the less you pay.
What a company decides to do with their product doesn't bother me at all. It's their product and they are free to market it any way that they wish.
If a manufacturer were stupid enough to sell their products to the general public (you, not Dan) at a price that was less than what they were selling to dealers then the free market system would take care of it all by itself and pretty quick at that. High Country tried this a few years ago, lost most of their dealer base, and dang near went out of business because of it.
But none of this has anything to do with why the 340 doesn't seem to have the same problem as the 350. There is only one real physical difference in the two bows. Can you or any of the other "must be a design flaw" guys explain why the problem exists in one bow and not the other?
.