Originally Posted by
bigbulls
I wonder why the 340 doesn't seem to have the same perceived "problem" that the 350 does????????? Anyone care to offer up an explanation? I mean.... they have the same hardcore limbs, same overdrive cams, same Octane strings. Everything about these two bows is exactly the same except for one thing. Anyone know what that one thing is??????
I know the answer but do the rest of you?
Well apparently the inexperienced archers who buy bows of to high a poundage and have know idea how to draw or let down a bow and have a draw length greater then 29+ only buy the 350.
Conversely the archers that know how to draw and let down a bow and can handle the higher poundage buy the 340.
Just in case its not clear the above reply is a bad attempt at sarcasm.
Some of the differences between the 340 & 350.
Different Riser, Longer FlexGuard, cable 1/8 shorter on the 340, 1 inch longer brace height, draw length on the 340 starts an inch longer and finishes and inch longer then the 350, Kinetic energy output approx 5.4ft-lb lower on the 340, the module setting on the 340 @29inch is pos 5 compared to the 350 pos 3, the post setting on the 340 @29inch is pos 5 compared to the 350 pos 3, String position on the cam at full draw is different (340 appears to have more string on the lobe at full draw compared to the 350), 340 slightly slower then the 350.
I am surprised a man of your obvious knowledge and experience could ever utter the words
Everything about these two bows is exactly the same except for one thing. Anyone know what that one thing is??????
Why don't you educate us on the one thing that is different.
Michael