Originally Posted by
annika3
No, I would call myself a common sense one.
I am not sure too many would agree with you.
I'm not the one that tries to convince fellow bowhunters what to use and that their way is the only way.
Yes you are.
Marginal improvement = hitting closer to where you aim and we all know SHOT PLACEMENT is the most important factor in bowhunting.
If shot placement is so important as you claim, you sure wouldn't have made the argument you tried a few posts back shooting an alert deer with all these contortions.
Also, I never claimed mechanicals overcome torquing. What I did say is torquing your bow will affect your arrow more using fixed heads.
Very little to none with a properly tuned setup.
Funny thing is that you continue to try to convince people to shoot what you do because you think it is the right way and only way. That's strange!
I have yet to see you miss a rage post, but yet, now you say, you respect all's opinion. Yea, right. You came on here attacking one of the most knowlegable bowhunters on HNI, and I came on to correct you.
Seriously, if you think fixed is better, great, say there better. But keep your "Rage or other mechanicals are no good" out of it. I have a hard time believing that all those Rage and other mechanical shooters that have sucess over and over can all be wrong. I've shot fixed and mechanicals and choose Rage. Why? Because I think the advantages of a Rage are better than a fixed.
Your extremely defensive over rage/snypers. Almost like you have a vested interest? Do you?
