Killing that bear may have been legal, but was it ethical?
Why isnt it? cause the bear wasnt as likely to run from humans as another? What difference does it make what the bears state of mind was? its still a wild animal. Besides Ive walked pretty close to some very wild bears in the woods, they didnt seem too afraid and I could have killed them with almost no effort, had I been armed, is that unethical cause the bear was dumb enough not to run? Again, why does there have to be this subjective aspect of difficulty for a hunt to be considered "ethical"?
