Originally Posted by
MO Archer
You said you work with stats. So you and I both know how they can be skewed to support just about anything. I provided a lot of stats. That was the main purpose for posting those articles. If you read them, they had statistics within them that support the theory that crossbows are not more dangerous, are not an advantage over vertical bows, and will not decimate the deer herd. Please show some statistics that support your OPINIONS. Picking and choosing data is EXACTLY what you were asking others in the thread to do a few pages back. You specifically asked for proof to support their OPINIONS. I hope you don't expect everyone that has an opinion different than yours to go out and conduct their own study.
I actually enjoyed all your posts, besides the one that had people knocking at my door. I appreciate it. I see where the articles were going, just the only one that really swayed one thing or the other was the Indian Head study. Just wish it had more samples than N=5, from a study point of view, not a arrowgun point of view.