HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - So crossbow are legal now......
View Single Post
Old 07-20-2010 | 06:15 PM
  #518  
bigbulls's Avatar
bigbulls
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Likes: 0
Default

80# compounds huh.
Something wrong with 80# compounds? You want to quote the speeds of the "super" crossbows but you think I must stick with the average compound bows as a comparison?????? Weren't you just complaining about just the opposite on a previous post about Tenpoint crossbows? Hi pot, my name is kettle.
Yep I know for fact the pse x-force omen 80 would and did not with a 405gr ACC with a 30" draw. But I am sure you read it somewhere. But then again, all a company has to do is to get one shooting IBO speed and advertise.
Even though you quoted it I guess your comprehension skills are still lacking cause you obviously missed this part.
Some would get real close and some would exceed 350fps.
But I expect nothing less from you any more.

I know for fact the pse x-force omen 80 would and did not with a 405gr ACC with a 30" draw.
So what speed did it hit?




Explain it to us. Teach us something. How would they get less revenue? Would you quit hunting outright? Yes you would?

Simple question, even a small child could answer.
No, I wouldn't quit hunting and I doubt many would but there will definitely be some.

Most archery hunters are also gun hunters.

If every state, or even just a few states, went to an anything goes season and the population is forced to make the decision to use a bow or rifle in an anything goes season I bet most hunters would opt to use their rifles for the obvious reasons.

If people aren't spending money on archery equipment the archery stores aren't making money and aren't paying taxes.

If the stores aren't selling it they will down size to maintain a profit and may eventually close up shop all together.

If stores close up shop people become unemployed and the state will pay unemployment benefits. This is called an expense.

If the stores aren't selling it then the manufacturers aren't manufacturing it. Less taxes paid to neighboring states.

If the manufacturers aren't manufacturing it they too will downsize and more people will be unempoloyed. Another state expense.

If the manufacturers aren't producing as much then they are ordering less raw materials.

It's a long trickle up cycle.


The offsetting of the additional gun hunters (most are already gun hunting any way) that you are going to argue, that will be buying more guns and ammo won't be enough to keep many of the family owned archery shops in business.

I didn't know that you were so anti-capitalist and so pro-unemployed.


What does "strangle mean"?
strange. Do you really want me to go back through your posts and start pointing out your many many spelling and punctuation errors?

Last edited by bigbulls; 07-20-2010 at 06:59 PM.
bigbulls is offline  
Reply