Originally Posted by
SteveBNy
I just truly feel compounds are not archery equipment. I've handled them, seen what they can do, and regardless they have a very distinct advantage over recurves/longbows that the season was started for.
Regardless Steve compounds are more archery than crossbows. You like to make the compounds a point continously. Thats fine. But how do you think the traditionalists feel about having crossbows on top of compounds? That ever cross your mind!!
Or how do you think the small game hunters would feel about more hunters in the woods during the combined archery, and small game seasons with crossbows. That ever cross your mind too?