HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Why no 270 "08"?
Thread: Why no 270 "08"?
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2010 | 11:12 AM
  #8  
salukipv1's Avatar
salukipv1
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default
and now they have it covered every other from .243-338....ie...


243 257 260 270 7mm-08 no gap here 308 323 338


Originally Posted by DeerandbearhoG
I know I actually just wrote that. the idea is, why all those diameters, but no 277?

Well then,I guess there should be no .257rbts since theres only .007 difference between the 257 and 264(260)? Theres actually a big difference between a 130gn .284 and 130rg .277, in sectional density.


IMO we have no need for anything besides 22lr, 223, 243, 30-06 and 375hh, but I just find it odd that there is no 308based .277
salukipv1 is offline  
Reply
0