HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Why no 270 "08"?
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2010 | 11:01 AM
  #3  
DeerandbearhoG's Avatar
DeerandbearhoG
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Orange county, NY
Default

Originally Posted by salukipv1
because the '08 has already been necked to; .243, .260, 7mm-08, .308, .338, .358
I know I actually just wrote that. the idea is, why all those diameters, but no 277?

the .270 is right in between the 260 and 7mm-08, the .277 and .284(7mm) are essentially the same diameter, .007 difference? could be argued that both the 260 and 7mm-08 are better options than a 270-08 would be.
Well then,I guess there should be no .257rbts since theres only .007 difference between the 257 and 264(260)? Theres actually a big difference between a 130gn .284 and 130rg .277, in sectional density.


In my opinion we really have no need for a .270-08,
IMO we have no need for anything besides 22lr, 223, 243, 30-06 and 375hh, but I just find it odd that there is no 308based .277
DeerandbearhoG is offline  
Reply