If you want to argue what is and isn't traditional, then by all means do so with whomever you want. But the application of such logic to whether or not someone should be "ALLOWED" to do something, is in fact illogical.

Bottom line, it doesn't hurt you, the deer, or anything else in the world. Therefore, the government has no place preventing people from doing so, based on your opinion of what is and is not traditional...

Ethics and morality are social concerns, NOT LEGAL CONCERNS.

If you want to buy land, and have it be stick bows only, THEN BY ALL MEANS. But public land, and even leased land, you have no right to deny someone else something based on you PERSONAL opinion.

It is just like walking down the street, you dont have to like the Jones' kids, with their mohawk haircuts and hole-ridden jeans, but they've just as much a right to wear their clothes, as you do to wear clothes of your own preference.

I'm a mustang lover... particularly the 64-68... and I have a soft spot for the restoration to original specs, for not opting for modern amenities and performance parts... But I'm not going to hate on someone for droping a 427 cobrajet motor in a 64 coupe, or for people driving camaros and 'cudas...

Same premise.

Soapbox relinquished...