Originally Posted by
DeerandbearhoG
I would have to disagree here. A 1'' hole through the lungs will do all the damage necessary to recover a deer within 100yds or less, from the site of impact, you dont need to turn the vitals into hamburger. A non pass through will only do alot of damage if it goes in just the right depth, it will also very likely come back out rather than stay inside the deer. The biggest problem w/ a non pass through is that you will almost always get less blood on the ground , especially if the shot hits high on sharp angles. IMO a pass though is always better than an arrow sticking in the deer.
I have to agree with you on that account. A broadhead chewing up the insides is GREAT dont get me wrong, but when the deer runs into a thicket and dies without a blood trail, things can get really really tough... Even if both deer went 100 yds and ran the exact same route and died in the same spot, the deer with the pass through is going to at least be easier to find.