I will be doing an upcoming elk hunt and was thinking about a new scope but didn't want to spend $500+ if I didn't have to. I was thinking about the Nikon Monarch in the Nikoplex and didn't know whether it is better to go with the 4 x 16 or the 3 x 12 or 2.5 x 10. I was thinking about getting the obj dia in 42mm. I am assuming the longest shot may be 300 yards but more likely closer to 200 yards.

All these scopes are roughly the same size and cost about the same price.

I assume the 10x is enough but want my minimum mag. a little higher so I'll probably rule out the 2.5 x 10. I know the bigger the magnification the weight and length increases. Will I loose clarity or field of view? What other factors do i need to consider? What size would you choose?

My other thought is that I'd sight my gun in for 200 yds. If the animal is ranged at 300 yds I just hold 6 inches higher. I don't see a need to buy a more expensive scope.

All input is appreciated.

Thank you!!