Originally Posted by
tangozulu
WTF????????????? ecosystem biology to political biology? What are you talkin about? Why is killin off a species not political but introducing one is? Why is introducing a species considered pandering to a certain element of society and bad........only because it is not you being pandered too. I believe it is economic biology you are really trying to implement. In your world only animals that can be cashed in are worthy. Wolves are killin elk without compensating you, thus bad.
I assure you there are plenty of REAL hunters that can quite effectivly compete with wolves. TRY it yourself and see if your up to the challenge.
It is your agument that makes no sence. Is there not both native Americans and Americans of European decent living side by side in Montana and Idaho. By your argument this is not possable.
Tango, it is obvious you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. What are the ramifications to elk herds in the Madison Valley, Gallatine Valley, Idaho Selway etc? Do you even have a clue? You surmise that it boils down to "real hunters"? Defend your position instead of making broad pointless nonsensicle arguments like "turn back the page" or any of the other clueless dribble you have espoused. You compare todays ecosystem with yesterdays, thats absurd, you compare Canada's ecosystem with ours here, also absurd. I strongly suggest you actually have a look at BIOLOGICAL data before you run your mouth about "real hunters". Get a clue.
