HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Finally
Thread: Finally
View Single Post
Old 03-17-2010 | 08:21 AM
  #4  
bluebird2
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WV Gino
Question for you bluebird

how much worse would the regen have been in 2G if the GC had not reduced the herd 50%?

Put that in your crop and chew on it a while before you spit out your answer.


Wv Gino

Neither you ,the PGC or DCNR has the answer to that question since the audit shows there is no correlation between deer density and forest regeneration. Put that in you pipe and smoke it!

Maybe you'd like to explain why regeneration decreased from 45% to 38% in 2G after the herd had been reduced. Remember, the DD is now 50% below what the same experts said was the carrying capacity of the habitat in 2G in 2003. Why did they change their mind and why didn't it work?

Last edited by bluebird2; 03-17-2010 at 08:36 AM.
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply