HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - More complaints on the PGC
View Single Post
Old 03-16-2010, 02:56 PM
  #72  
Cornelius08
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
Default

"Ok we'll just use the word you use. your post about lowest harvests in 50 years is a lie. "

Wrong word. The word is accurate. The word for what you are trying to do now is lie. In the context in which it was stated by me it was completely right on the money. And i proved it. You've just made up a bunch on excuses ever since.

"For any year before 1986 and in the absence of a reporting rate. any comparison would be false."

At least thats a valid opinion for a change....But if you take the data at face value, it says what it says and you havent proven otherwise....and if you want to interject variables and look past the base data, then it could be just as accurately argued it may have been even longer than 50 because the 60% noncompliance nonsense is a complete pulled out of the air joke in the first place! lol. Also remember wmi said that much of the pgc data was insufficient and lacking. The estimated harvest very well may have been even lower than estimated the last few years.

"So lets look at the harvests calculated since 1986"

No, lets not. because it has nothing to do with anything said! lol This is just sidetracking.

"lowest in that time 300,004 in 1986

second lowest since that time 335,850

highest in that time 517,529 in 2002

lowest since HR 323,070 in 2007

second lowest since HR 335,850 in 2008"

What on earth was all that mumbo jumbo about??? (nevermind, i dont want to know) Noone said anything about comparing the last 2 or 3 years to each other! Noone said a thing about the 2nd highest or lowest harvest SINCE HR, lmao.


"As for hunter success lets only use years since 1988 when bonus tags came in"

Who said anything about harvest success rates??? lmao. Your also not talking hunter success, your talking harvest per tag. very important when hunters in urban areas can go out with bazillion tags... what is it in one wmu now? Like 100,000 tags? lmao. A Guy goes out there and shoots 5 deer, and 5 hunters in 2g dont get a deer, you would still end up with a 100% success rate by your logic!

Im done with this repetitious ridiculous yes-sir, no-sir, yes sir...

If you want to say something thats not true about the 3 things you were wrong about last night fine. If you actually think after reading all this, someone is gonna believe you because you say it isnt so one more time, then good luck to you, the last word is yours. lmao. Just try and not make it too big of a whopper eh?

Last edited by Cornelius08; 03-16-2010 at 03:05 PM.
Cornelius08 is offline