HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - More complaints on the PGC
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2010 | 10:49 PM
  #57  
BTBowhunter's Avatar
BTBowhunter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
Default

Originally Posted by Cornelius08
That was your statement and that was the topic and that is what you were wrong about... Youre trying to cloud the issue with all the other extra unnecessary twisting and writhing and just plain silly challenges trying to take the attention from yourself, like telling me to find a pgc statement referrring to tags that were legal for either sex as "either sex tags" specifically as if that was their given name and as if that matters in any way shape or form whether you referred to them as buck tags, back tags, either sex tags or meat paper.. ! lmao.

Didnt have a thing to do with the either sex tag the tag in question and that you were wrong about was ANTLERLESS ONLY tags or "doe" tags you spoke of.. (and the "either sex" was description of tag not name of the tag! ... Though you knew this).

Separate DOE tags not back tags that could be used for buck only or used with a doe license for doe or buck! SEPARATE DOE/ANTLERLESS tags. You are trying to get out of being wrong again, but its too late. The deal is done.

You also were in no way personally attacked by me, but its pretty clear you are saying such out of desparation and tired of being proven wrong.

I'd say nice try, but it's actually kind of pathetic. That last post makes absolutely zero sense. To anyone who reads all the drivel from the point where you made the false 50 year claim, the truth should be obvious in spite of the smoke and mirrors.
BTBowhunter is offline  
Reply