HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - More complaints on the PGC
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2010 | 08:31 PM
  #53  
Cornelius08
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Default

"Sorry Corn but youre "
Sorry but not hardly.

"The estimated kill was started in 1986. before that, the trend in reported kills was rising."
Oh yes, we are all non law abiding criminals now but were pure of heart in the 70's and 80s! lmao

"The bottom line is that your 50 year claim has no basis in fact. What hole did you pull your little fact out of anyway?"
The Pgc "data hole". You have to go back to 1960 in the link i provided to find a lower buck harvest. (althought there is no data for 1961 listed)...So whether you wanna call it 50....48, 49, or whatever your heart desires, I think i'll stick to the nice round 50 if its all well and good with you? Certainly a far cry from the 20 youve been spouting! lmao.

"bazillion opportunities? In PA? But you keep telling us how hard it is for a PA hunter to see deer?!?!?!"
Now unless thats just another of your lies, please show a link pointing to a post i made saying that. Thats what i thought--in advance..

Gee, it seems to me that a bazillion opportunities ought to be enough for a mere million hunters LMAO!!
Absolutely and thats my point. TOO MUCH. And thats why even with all these opportunities and tags the harvest has declined...the herd has declined.

"Sorry if all the facts in that document overwhelmed you. I used 1986 because it was the first year where the system was the same as the one used now. "
And the data for "the old way" is also given. Though you used that year because it in no way shows the full extent of how pathetic the harvests are. Around 50 year low buck harvest and 2nd worst overall harvest as i said, in around 30-40....At least thats what the data shows.

"I used total kill. You chose to counter with only part of the facts."
I think your memory has slipped.I am the one who brought up the 50 year harvest deal NOT you! So what makes you think you can tell me what im talking about? Guess its too easy to jump in without asking detail just saying "wrong" and ending up sticking your foot in your mouth yet again. lmao.

Had you said 20 years it would have been true.
But then Id have been greatly understating it and not telling the full truth of the matter... The truth of roughly 50 year low buck harvests and 2nd lowest overall in the neighborhood of 30-40 years. I brought it up, but i guess i need your permission on how to word it? lmao. Yeah right.

"But hey, a 30 year miss aint that bad"
Yeah, youre just saying that because thats almost exactly how far you were off and are tryng to downplay it.


Last edited by Cornelius08; 03-15-2010 at 08:39 PM.
Cornelius08 is offline  
Reply