Originally Posted by
Cornelius08
..Of course it was, in fact i believe it was the first year. Unfortunately for you the "estimated" buck harvest was over 150,000 in 1986!!
Not estimated at 109k like in 2007...
W-R-O-N-G ---A-G-A-I-N!!
Sorry Corn but youre
W-R-O-N-G A-G-A-I-N !!!
The estimated kill was started in 1986. before that, the
trend in reported kills was rising. ( hint, do a rolling average and guess what you get?) The reported kill over the past 50 was also lower than the most recent reported kill several other times. The bottom line is that your 50 year claim has no basis in fact. What hole did you pull your little fact out of anyway?
And if you were speaking of overall harvest, then i guess we can call it the second lowest harvest in 30 or 40 years? lmao. Despite the fact we can use so many tags now and have a bazillion added opporunities? Gee thats great.
bazillion opportunities? In PA? But you keep telling us how hard it is for a PA hunter to see deer?!?!?! Gee, it seems to me that a bazillion opportunities ought to be enough for a mere million hunters LMAO!!
A pdf file of 145 or so pages, in pdf format, to sort through and then you pick one year to compare? YES. And the link i provided goes back alot further as well.
Sorry if all the facts in that document overwhelmed you. I used 1986 because it was the first year where the system was the same as the one used now. I used total kill. You chose to counter with only part of the facts. The real fact is that your claim that harvest are at a 50 year low has been proven to be totally false. Had you said 20 years it would have been true. But hey, a 30 year miss aint that bad
LMAO