"Can't be about money here. We've lost 300,000 hunters since the PGC started their aggressive deer management. It's about an agenda here."
Its not. Its about an agenda. Pgc & dcnr have made the decision to concentrate on extreme unnatural levels of biodiversity and of course looking out, for their timber interests. As for the biodiversity...PGc Dcnr & environmentalist groups have formed the "biodiversity partnership" and the plan is in motion. They dont care who likes it or who doesnt. Same with the attempts of dcnr to use the deer herd to compensate for poor timbering practices both past and present...
These things have a common goal... Less deer.