What are you on?WMI specifivcally stated that there was plenty of evidence that supported deer as being the primary contributing factor for the lack of regeneration.That's not even in question.
The WMI report didn't state there was a lack of regeneration. The audit , just like the DCNR reports said there was a lack of regeneration of commercially valuable species. The WMI report also stated that environmental conditions other than deer were responsible for the shift in tree species
Sure,other factors also contribute but deer do the most damage.A partial quote from some report doesn't prove otherwise.
Remember , you told use that just 3 deer in an exclosure wiped out the oak regeneration. So, do you support a DD of 3 DPSM in all of our oak forests?