The comment "just another tool in the toolbox" was made at the January meeting. Ive also read it in print but aint spending all evening looking for it. If youd like to look it up and for some reason think that your evaluation will somehow make pgcs pro-use policy more acceptable....I contend its not possible, but do as you please.

Pgc has a pro-use policy. I do not support that. AT ALL. While they may refer to it as just another tool in the toobox, i call it more bullsquare from a VERY nonhunter friendly agency.


This is not a hunter friendly issue no matter how you try to spin it. And its a nonhunter friendly action being taken by a commission that has been known for that more and more each year that goes by. Just when you think things cant possibly get any more ridiculous at pgc where deer management is concerned, they go above and beyond.