Very misleading post. This has been addressed and pgc's prouse policy basically says it all. Roe can lie all he likes, but fact is, he supported the policy being "pro-use" as opposed to "no use" which they very clearly couldve and shouldve done.

But no, they said it would be another "tool" in the "toolbox". And they are already structuring plans for its use in urban/suburban deer managment plans.

Carls damage control is no different with this than it was when he downplayed and lied constantly about the HUGE marcellus windfall thats now been proven by the legislative budget & finance committee, and also no different than all the lies that have been told and proven in regards to the miserably failed deer program.

This is nothing more than beating a dead horse. The deal is done. One more bit of anti-hunter sentiment showing through at pgc.