Now you just professed to believe exactly everything said word for word by the audit member, use it as evidence to support further reduction because habitat hasnt improved..

Then turn around and say you support the plan because its made progress towards the goal.

Thats contradiction.

The piece said that the habitat DIDNT improve, and in fact ever so slightly regressed.

That tells me the plan was a complete failure. Excessive reductions did nothing to aid the habitat, the herd health or much of anything else and thats been proven. We can go even more "extreme" and do more mad scientist experimenting to "see what happens" and screw the hunters over in the process even more, or we can start managing like we have some sense like most other states in the nation with reasonable deer density goals who somehow find a way to survive and prosper.

Might also wanna note dcnr etc. involvement in the "fact finding mission" of wmi. If we wanted an audit of our regeneration done by Pa dcnr, all we had to do is ask them and save ourselves 90k. We already knew their ridiculous goals and thoughts on having wall to wall stands of money trees,and despite rock bottom densities....too many deer eating their profits.

But hey, qdma just keep right on supporting everything told to them. Its the politically correct thing to do. Especially when none of their hunting on private managed lands are effected anyway.