Originally Posted by bluebird2

IMHO the fact that WMI interviewed DCNR does not mean the audit was biased. But , when WMI stated that no stakeholder grouped benefited more than any other group, that was simply laughable. It is blatantly obvious that DCNR and the timber industry benefited the most from the plan while the hunters suffered the most.

The PGC DMP is actually a timber management plan and has little to do with scientific deer management since the plan is not based on the true carrying capacity of the habitat. Instead it is based on the regeneration of commercially valuable timber that exists in our current forests.