We dont have to bend over to the whims of "birdwatchers" at audubon etc. to "ensure our sport continues". We are the management tool and polls have been taken in the past that show the overwhelming majority of society supports us being used as the management tool. We dont need to cater to extremist agendas to be "accepted". To "bridge that gap" is a politically correct way of saying give them whatever they want. I dont agree with that at all. Compromise is one thing. Well im fresh compromised out. Its way over crossed the line from compromising to us being flat out tread upon. And there is absolutely NOTHING they have to offer us that WE need in that "compromise". Some interests your not gonna appease and everyones not gonna be happy. Im not supporting selling out myself and my hunting brethren for those nuts at audubon etc. who call us everything in the book except men anyway.

So if reasonable responsible deer densities and "normal to the eastern usa" forest conditions arent good enough even with the attempts we are currently making at getting them even better...then im sorry but im not gonna shed a tear.

And as long as thats qdmas position, then i have no respect for that stance and a big problem with that organization and would suggest to anyone thinking of joining, not to. Just another self serving politcally motivated group. Sincerely not trying to be confrontational either, and nothing against any individual. I find that sentiment very damaging to our sport because it causes division, and it also strengthens our enemies voice. Some gaps arent meant to be bridged.