I'm not spinning anything.The audit did point out flaws but it never said the basic premise of herd reductions was flawed.Without a doubt,100 plots to monitor the state is ridiculous.That I agree with.We have almost that many on 9500 acres and monitor them every two years.[QUOTE

You are confusing the fact that while the audit supported the over all goal of herd reduction and improved regeneration, it pointed out many significant flaws in how the herd was being managed, which means that the PGC DMP is flawed and you claimed that it wasn't.

WMI couldn't even figure out how the PGC used the forest health criteria to determine allocations, because I have said for years ,it make no sense.