Originally Posted by
bluebird2
They most certainly said the plan was flawed since they said that all three of the criteria the PGC uses to manage the herd were flawed. Flawed or inadequate dat results in a flawed plan no matter how you spin it.
Using 100 plots /year to determine forest health and antlerless allocations is ridiculous and proves that the PGC was just giving hunters a snow job.
I'm not spinning anything.The audit did point out flaws but it never said the basic premise of herd reductions was flawed.Without a doubt,100 plots to monitor the state is ridiculous.That I agree with.We have almost that many on 9500 acres and monitor them every two years.