1st, there is no "propaganda". I simply state the facts. But you did make a good catch. That was in the article and there were quotes from several different people, Rosenberry, roe,dubrock & Miller. I reread, and Miller did say that. But it doesnt make matters any better when Pgc has a pro use policy and a means is soon to be available to use it on a wider scale much easier and cheaper according to miller.

However Rosenberry DID say this:

"This changes the fertility drug situation considerably," agreed Rosenberry.
No community or group will be using the vaccine here in Pennsylvania right away."

Right away? lmao.

"A lot of people are trying to say that this is the panacea for urban deer management. We're trying to say, not so fast," said Carl Roe, executive director of the commission.
"You can quote me on this: there are going to be a lot of tough hoops to get through to use this."

But they ARE gonna use it after making it through those big bad "hoops" right Carl? lmao.

Commissioner Delaney also stated they were voting on USING CONTRACEPTION at the January meeting. Guess you missed that too? lol. Im pretty sure you didnt miss my other links on this site where pgc flat out stated they were pro-contraception by having a policy of USE, not a no-use policy.

When they speak of all the things Ive shown pluse call it "another tool in the toolbox", i think its pretty obvious, their position is a pro-use policy.

Pgc is clearly trying to downplay their enthusiam, Id say thats a smart move considering the all the heat they are already under by the legislators and hunters of this state.

Sorry. But as i said before its not debatable. Only reason i posted what i did wasnt to show them as having a pro-use policy. Thats already well known by most by now. It was to show that things are gonna go from bad to worse with making administering the drug MUCH easier and MUCH cheaper according to millers statement.