Originally Posted by
Maverick 1
No, it didn't fail because the deer browsed it all. It failed because the deer browsed what was left which, suggest that their are other factors at play.
You guys are in such denial it's ridiculous.THAT ENTIRE AREA WAS CUT AND HALF WAS FENCED.BOTH SIDE RECIEVED THE SAME AMOUNT OF WATER,LIGHT AND ACID RAIN.The only thing the unfenced side had that the fenced side did not have was deer.It's that simple and there's hundreds of areas just like that which proves without any doubt how much of a limiting factor the deer are.