Originally Posted by
ManySpurs
Dang I wish I would have set the cam on 4.1 mp when I set it up. I'd have a finer picture. But here's a pic from the original. Looks like it's ripped right down to the fat to me.
Hard to tell from a picture but I'm thinking that we're looking at bare hide. If it was down to the fat, wouldnt we see a rougher edge? I'd also think we'd see some meat visible down toward the lower part of that area. I would think an injury that could get through the hide wouldnt look so nice and smooth underneath.Just my best guess!!
