Originally Posted by
mr.mc54
Let me ask a question, if I may. What makes your opinion more important than others who may value the constitution and the ability to own, as you call em "assault" weapons. I don't think hunters are decieved, most value the constitution and their right to bear arms. Note, it doesn't discriminate as to what kind or weather it is for hunting or protection. You sound like someone who shouldn't own a firearm as you get agitated too easily. Now whats with knocking the guy who posts an inocent question about a shirt he saw? You got issues MR. You sure set a great example for those who read the posts on this forum.
What exactly
is your question? Your apparent question is muddled. I never said my opinion was more important than anyone's. And I wouldn't disagree with anyone who values the constitution and the ability to own "assault" weapons. And it ain't "as I call 'em". If you were sharp enough, you would have noticed that the usage of quotations around "assault rifles" is an indication of what
they (the anti-gunners) call 'em.
Hunters aren't deceived? Really?? First, it should be OBVIOUS that I didn't mean ALL HUNTERS. Regardless, as to your ignorant statement, perhaps you should look into the trojan horse that is the American Hunters and Shooters Association.
I never knocked
the guy, I knocked the statement on the crappy t-shirt. But I can see how someone as dim as you could get confused so easily. As I stated above, it's a vital issue that, when misrepresented, gets me agitated. I'm quite tired of the B.S. surrounding it.
Now as for me having issues and you determining that I "sound like someone who shouldn't own a firearm," from a POST on the INTERNET, not knowing a THING about me, shows your true colors and the depth of your stupidity. I guess you'll be toasting it up with your fellow gun grabbers the next time they are successful on yet another infringement.