Originally Posted by
Cornelius08
"LOL Whatever were they thinking! Imagine, WMI having the audacity to examine the DMP by using S-C-I-E-N-C-E."
Apparently you didnt read so well in this instance. I said nothing about wmi using "science". I spoke of the science behind the deer plan, and my post was pretty self explanatory and doesnt need your decietful attempts at alternate highly inaccurate interpretations.
If you agree with the extreme biodiversity goals, good for you. But most wouldnt trade reasonable numbers of deer for tons upon ton of trillium. Yet managing for that ton upon ton of trillium requires just as much "science" as managing for a healthy balance. So "science" isnt the issue.
No deceipt in using your very words. Those words looked to be pretty self explanatory.
Please provide us the link showing the DMP goals to be "trading reasonable numbers of deer for tons and tons of trillium"
You've claimed that to be the goal. Can you prove that?
BTW, simply yelling that it's obvious isn't proof.