"LOL Whatever were they thinking! Imagine, WMI having the audacity to examine the DMP by using S-C-I-E-N-C-E."

Apparently you didnt read so well in this instance. I said nothing about wmi using "science". I spoke of the science behind the deer plan, and my post was pretty self explanatory and doesnt need your decietful attempts at alternate highly inaccurate interpretations.

If you agree with the extreme biodiversity goals, good for you. But most wouldnt trade reasonable numbers of deer for tons upon ton of trillium. Yet managing for that ton upon ton of trillium requires just as much "science" as managing for a healthy balance. So "science" isnt the issue.