Originally Posted by
bigcountry
All I can tell you is, you asked for opinions. I gave you mine. You don't like it, I understand. It happens.
You're right, I did. It has nothing to do with me liking your opinion or not. This is one thing:
Originally Posted by
bigcountry
...can't say I have seen where a second strike helped a gun go off if the gun is working correctly. I have seen encores with hammer extentions not strike hard enough. This is the guns fault. I have seen plenty of rounds get hit square and hard on the primers, and not go off, and the 93% number is BS. I have seen remington 7400's not strike hard enough because of cold weather and oil along iwth resedue made grease. Again, this is the guns fault.
See, that's your opinion with backed reasoning.
This is another:
Originally Posted by
bigcountry
Originally Posted by
7.62NATO
Taurus
I think this says it all. You again have answered your own question and didn't know it.
Has nothing to do with the question at hand and ignores the FACT that many
other than those at Taurus acknowledge that there are primers that are too hard that WILL go off if struck a second time. I used Taurus as an example of a company that offers a strike two feature on their guns, nothing more, and the fact that you obviously think Taurus is a crap brand doesn't disprove anything, even if the 93% figure is B.S.
And this is complete B.S., because it simply ain't true:
Originally Posted by
bigcountry
A true FTF primer being blamed would show no fire no matter how much you hit it.