Originally Posted by
bluebird2
So you are saying the PGC set goals for 5B and 5C so low that they looked like idiots so they could set low goals for 2F and 2G? I don't think that is the case since those goals were the same goals the PGC has been using since 1980, but they were adjusted to account for the change from DPFSM to DPSM.
Haven't you figured out by know ,I don't buy much of anything the PGC has to say about deer management. I am just telling you that they only assign habitat value to forested land and ignore all the rest.
I don't think they're goal was to look like idiots, but it just turns out that way.
Yes, I do have your impression of the PGC figured out. I know that they only assing value to forested land and that is how they justify their actions. The timber has value. Open space does not.
I think we are on the same page about quite a few things. I do think that the PGC has done a few good things in spite of themselves. They may not have happened by design, but if you trip and fall over a bag of money your account is still going to get bigger.
