Originally Posted by
bluebird2
Please feel free to provide any data you may have that refutes the PGC data. Furthermore, I don't pick and choose PGC data as you claim. I use all of the PGC data whether or not it supports my position. But, you don't even have a clue what the PGC data might be, yet you criticize me.
Why do I need to refute data that has nothing to do with the topic at hand? I don't care what the decade long trends in fawn recruitment are, they have nothing to do with the topic at hand. I made a claim, and provided data that supported my claim. You introduced unrelated data, while ignoring the evidence I provided; and now you want me to refute your data.