Originally Posted by
Sheridan
I use Burris (signature select level - just as a FYI, there
are two higher quality levels) on all my bolts !
One of the biggest bangs for your buck, if
anyone says otherwise, IMO they don't know "what" they are talking about.
Unless, you need to spend $2,000 to play.
In which case, loupy's don't even rate.
For those independent thinkers;
http://www.chuckhawks.com/overview_burris_optics.htm
Interesting. Ok, for the 400-500 dollars you pay for a burris signature, you could get a Leupold.
Ok, lets separate the field here. Sure, the once a week rifle hunter, will be serviced fine with philp glass on a burris. No doubt. That the same hunter would do the same with a 200 dollar bushnell elite 3200 or even better served.
Why does burris feel the need for a posi-lok? With correct errector design, anybody in optics knows its not needed. And who is the manufacture so stupid to put a posilok on a target scope? I know.
How much errector movement can you get from from your signature (target turret) scope compared to a simular target turrent mounted loopy? I know the difference on comparitive 6.5-X loops and signature. I have had the both.
How far can you move the recticle on a signature before you start getting nonlinear results? I know on both leupolds and burris.
Lastly, I guarantee you, a person with a burris signature can't complete a optics box test and end up back to where they started. But I know for a fact I can on a M4. Or even a Vari-X 6.5-20 target.