Originally Posted by
bluebird2
Whether you realize or not ,you just agreed with me while claiming I was wrong. It takes a 1.5 spike 3 yrs. to catch up with a 1.5 6 or 8 pt.
Personal observations and opinions based on a very small sample size are irrelevant IMHO.
Point taken. I still don't feel that Krolls findings explain a buck regressing in antler points from 3-4. As you noted, however, very small sample size.