Originally Posted by
bluebird2
Maybe it was an inferior buck that was protected by ARs. Kroll's study showed that spikes and Y's are inferior for the rate of antler development.
You're 100% wrong, and once again it goes back to you cutting down ARs every chance you get, even when they have nothing to do with the conversation at hand. I went to a 2hr Kroll seminar this summer in which he specifically talked about the once a spike always a spike montra. They found that these "inferior" bucks ALWAYS caught up in antler growth by maturity (4.5). As I stated in my first post, the dominant buck was a perfect 8pt at 3.5, and returned as a 7pt at maturity. Even if what you said was true, it would not explain why this buck lost a point at maturity, and peaked at 4.5, when his subordinate counterpart added points from 3-4, and added inches from 4-5. So again I ask, do you have a plausible explanation as to why this happened.