driftrider, -- Now that's just absurd, laughable even. I'm not drawing any conclusions about Huck's motivation like you're stating. That's false. And yes, I am directing my comments at the stupids out there that do think this is funny. If you think those people don't exist, that is your problem and not mine. This isn't an assumption. It's a FACT.

Essentially by your reply, you are saying that there are NO people out there that think these photos are funny. That's a realistic assumption one would come to by reading your comments.

Go to YouTube. You'll find several "unethical" shots there captured on video and the comments there will make one sick... at least me anyway, because you feel they don't exist apparently. Many of these inhumane and unethical video shots don't last long, as I've seen several come and go. They get flagged readily.

Of course you forgot the post a few weeks back about the guy hitting deer on purpose with his special rigged pickup... then selling DVD's. Well, I'm reminding you of that NOW. I suppose you didn't see other forums where some people were saying it was funny, right? Please. This is no different.

Then what's really funny!??? You go and criticize me for giving my opinion to take the head shot is ridiculous... telling me I'm stating the obvious...

...yet YOU then say "As for the picture, this is a prime example of why head shots aren't a great idea."

That's you essentially saying the SAME thing. LOL!

I don't need any more evidence I do now that there are people out there who actually take shots like this on purpose... and also think it's funny.

Why you addressing me anyway? I wasn't talking to you. It was Huckleberry's misfortune to not be able to comprehend what I was saying originally and misunderstood what I originally said. Had Huck read my reply more thoroughly or at least understood it, he then would have known there was no need for a reply to it anyway! It's not my fault if people lack comprehension skills to carry on a conversation. (and Huck, if you weren't your usual can't-understand-what-was-just-said-self, you wouldn't have commented at all on my reply!) Call it "touchy" driftrider, I can live with that! Had people more comprehensive skills, or just took the time to read more carefully and knew how to get their meaning across and the ability to comprehend what was said, there wouldn't be any need for me to come and correct the bs to begin with. It's akin to measuring twice, cutting once!

"So you were directing your comments at those folks you assume will find this picture funny..."

Dang straight! Except it's NOT an assumption. It's a fact. Like many of my brother and sister fellow hunters here, I don't condone a headshot and those that think it's funny. Who knows, it just may be an errant shot, but that's not the point.

Also, as a REMINDER, below is what I originally said:

"It's an ugly thing to see, but it does happen and is a reminder to the stupids out there who try this arrogant, thoughtless and ridiculous shot, that it often doesn't pan out and this is what you are left with.

If any of you out there think this is funny, better re-evaluate yourself... on more than one level."

The ridiculous reply I receive to that is what set this whole bs thing off. Don't anyone think I'll sit back and catch flack for something I never said nor meant to say. If one is going to have issues with what I said, at least get what I said, right. LOL! I can live with that.

iSnipe