Ignoring what was actually said in poor damage control attempt. Fact is, pgc supports birth control "vigorous real world testing" in Pennsylvania. How effective it is or isnt is not in question. Its the fact they are willing to support it. There ARE groups that think it very effective. Nuts. Guess pgc likes catering to nuts these days... Permitting audubon to have a huge say in all matters including our game lands & deer management program.... Lobbying the legislators with hsus's own Sarah Speed for crying out loud, and supporting contraception.

Most other states do not support it, and you've been shown the examples of how NOT to support it. Did pgc do that? Hell no! They did just the opposite. You posting of partial quotes from the piece that do absolutely nothing to counter that fact are 100% meaningless.

They are currently supporting contraception. You have nothing to post to change that fact unless they do an about face and completely change that position. Whenever something comes available to change this:

""Given the unproven nature of these drugs to control or manage a free-ranging deer population, any Game Commission guidelines for their use will be designed to rigorously test this drug in real world circumstances."

I'll be interested in seeing it. Till then all you're wasting type in a very inadequate damage control attempt. but dont hold your breath while looking for a change in their pro-contraception policy. It wont be coming soon from an agency that currently supports the audubon antideer agenda and calls hunters crybabies & also calls them headaches right on their web page. As if this contraception crap is a huge surprise coming from this crew! lmao.