Im open to suggestions which we could realistically expect. A reasonable minimum at the very least for starters.

I think a simple responsible reduction in the allocation across the state, varying the amount of reduction to the allocation according to area. But thats just my opinion. Im shooting for the bottom because the more radicle the changes proposed, the less likely they are to ever happen. The odds arent even good right now for much of anything Let alone sweeping changes and things intended to save a ton of deer all at once.. I look at it is compromise. Also look at it as something very acceptable to all involved considering where we where 10 years ago and where we are now. It also wouldnt compromise their season structure and studies that are based upon them.