I did read some time ago that all Ruger rifle stocks were straight with no cant to them........hmmmm.

I shoot a good bit, and the closest comparison between the 2 rifles felt like shooting a 7mm. Rem. Mag. and then a .300 Win. Mag.

I know "felt recoil" is subjective to every particular person. I'm NOT an overly recoil sensitive person. I honestly can't tell any difference between a .270, .30-06, or 7mm. Rem. Mag. most times......but that Ruger really tapped me!

Both rifles are listed with the same LOP. The Browning did have a nice palm swell.

Has anyone else noticed VERY noticable differences between 2 different rifles that were very similar???

I see a couple folks talking about their Remingtons hitting them as hard as their Rugers........