HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Recovered bullet - crazy ricochet?
View Single Post
Old 12-03-2009 | 09:15 PM
  #13  
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
skeeter 7MM
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan Canada
Default

Originally Posted by iSnipe
You know, about 15 years ago, one of the hunting mags had what you call a "scientific" study on the Brush Gun theory.

They tested many different rounds shooting through a criss-crossed pattern of dowel sticks. They concluded that the larger bullet's better ability to bust through deflection over lighter bullets, was so inconsequential, it hardly made a difference.

So from what I gathered then, the brush gun theory didn't hold water, so to say. You'll get "similar" amounts of deflection from a heavier bullet as a lighter one. Overall conclusion is that, yes, the heavier bullets did better, but not enough to warrant it's superiority.

While I only have a handful of real world conclusions to go by, and trying to use reasoning as a means to come to my own conclusions, I still find it hard to think I won't be better off using a 30-30 through brush than a .243.

iSnipe
Is your opinion based really on the bullet/caliber size or actually the rifle/setup best fit to the situation???

A bush gun to me is a small frame/quick handling, short range (slower velocity/big lead) and often unscoped. 30/30, etc fit this mold a lot better then a 243,etc. I carried a 4570 lever as a guide, iron sights and big lead. Wasn't to get through bush it was strictly to slow a bear in tight cover. Only needed once and it worked as I had intended...lol
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Reply