Originally Posted by
iSnipe
You know, about 15 years ago, one of the hunting mags had what you call a "scientific" study on the Brush Gun theory.
They tested many different rounds shooting through a criss-crossed pattern of dowel sticks. They concluded that the larger bullet's better ability to bust through deflection over lighter bullets, was so inconsequential, it hardly made a difference.
So from what I gathered then, the brush gun theory didn't hold water, so to say. You'll get "similar" amounts of deflection from a heavier bullet as a lighter one. Overall conclusion is that, yes, the heavier bullets did better, but not enough to warrant it's superiority.
While I only have a handful of real world conclusions to go by, and trying to use reasoning as a means to come to my own conclusions, I still find it hard to think I won't be better off using a 30-30 through brush than a .243.
iSnipe
Is your opinion based really on the bullet/caliber size or actually the rifle/setup best fit to the situation???
A bush gun to me is a small frame/quick handling, short range (slower velocity/big lead) and often unscoped. 30/30, etc fit this mold a lot better then a 243,etc. I carried a 4570 lever as a guide, iron sights and big lead. Wasn't to get through bush it was strictly to slow a bear in tight cover. Only needed once and it worked as I had intended...lol